Mann has been the recipient of several fellowships and prizes, including selection as one of the 50 leading visionaries in Science and Technology by Scientific American, the outstanding scientific publication award of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and recognition by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) for notable citation of his refereed scientific research. Mann is one of several climate scientists who contribute to the RealClimate blog.

He is best known for his paleoclimate ‘hockey stick’ reconstructions of climatic fluctuations over the past several millennia, based on evidence from tree rings, ice cores, corals and other physical proxies. Such reconstructions have been the subject of some controversy; see temperature record of the past 1000 years for an overview. Mann’s recent work has been on modelling El Niño, and he has said that “we are already committed to 50 to 100 years of global warming and several centuries of sea level rise” and that reduction in fossil fuel emissions is required to slow the process down to a level that can be coped with.

In November 2009, Mann’s correspondence with fellow climate researchers was among that released in the Climatic Research Unit hacking incident. In an interview broadcast by the BBC, Mann commented that the “emails are genuine and have been misrepresented, cherry-picked, mined for single words and phrases that can be completely twisted to imply the opposite of what was actually being said…” He wrote in The Washington Post that the hacked e-mails “do not undermine the scientific case that human-caused climate change is real.”

To read more about Dr. Michael Mann’s research, you can start here:

http://www.realclimate.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E._Mann

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es053378b

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/Mann/index.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3569604.stm

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_senate_hearings&docid=f:92381.wais

Where does the scientific data confirming Climate Change and Global Warming come from?

http://tinyurl.com/UrbanHeat

http://tinyurl.com/NasaSurfTemp

http://tinyurl.com/SurfaceStations

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange

http://tinyurl.com/InstrumentTempWiki

http://tinyurl.com/Paleoclimate-Summary

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-cooling.htm

http://tinyurl.com/GlobalWarming-EvidenceSummary

http://web.mac.com/dannysatterfield/climatechange/Resources.html

http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249

http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=248

http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=271

http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=270

To read more articles, watch more videos, check interactive graphics and visualizations, you can go here:

http://climate.nasa.gov/warmingworld/

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/warming-world.html

You can watch an excellent series debunking Climate Change denialists here:

http://tinyurl.com/Science-ClimateChange

Climate Crock of the Week with Peter Sinclair produced here (go subscribe):

http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman3610

To listen to the entire interview, you can find it here:

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/

Duration : 0:9:45

[youtube GYkARZ5ANNo]

“This is to inform you that your submitted article has been accepted for publication after peer-reviewing process in TOISCIJ. I would be highly grateful to you if you please fill and sign the attached fee form and covering letter and send them back via email as soon as possible to avoid further delay in publication.

The publication fee was $800, to be sent to a PO Box in the United Arab Emirates.”

THE TWOOFERS FAIL AGAIN!

here is an English article about the latest prof. Jones’s paper

http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2009/04/active-thermitic-material-claimed-in.html

whats in paint chips?
http://www.rustrustler.com/

NIELS HARRIT’S nano-thermite theory is truly pathetic
first he claims wtc 7 fell in 6.5 seconds
which is pure bullshit, the collapse started when the east penthouse fell and took 16 seconds, even dylan avery and steven jones admit this now.
niels claiming 6.5 seconds after researching 911 for 71/2 years is inexcusable, very stupid.
then he claims 10-100 tonnes of ‘nano’-thermite were placed throughout the buildings, undetected!, lol.
that is batshit crazy!
to think office workers in the towers ignored thermite charges on the perimeter columns and said nothing to anyone is a vile insult to all the people who worked in the towers.
when the towers collapse there is not a hint of light from the tonnes of nano-thermite which would burn brighter then a arc welder and no charges are heard either and after the collapses there was tons of office paper fluttering in the sky over manhatten that was not even shredded or burnt
survivers in the 7th floor stairwell in wtc1 were not burnt and did not report demo charges going off. all of which proves there was no ‘nano-thermite’ explosive demolition, none,zero,zilch.

his only evidence are tiny red/grey chips that look like paint chips.

NIELS HARRITS IS TOO STUPID TO REALISE HOW STUPID HE REALLY IS!

Duration : 0:9:56

[youtube 7fc4ur7JUwI]